The mathematical definition of the Sigmoid activation function is

and its derivative is

The Sigmoid function and its derivative for a batch of inputs (a 2D array with nRows=nSamples and nColumns=nNodes) can be implemented in the following manner:
Sigmoid simplest implementation

import numpy as np
def Sigmoid(x):
    return 1/(1+np.exp(-x))

Sigmoid derivative simplest implementation

import numpy as np
def Sigmoid_grad(x):
    return np.exp(-x)/(np.exp(-x)+1)**2

However, these implementations can be further accelerated (sped-up) by using Numba (https://numba.pydata.org/). Numba is a Just-in-time (JIT) compiler that

translates a subset of Python and NumPy code into fast machine code.

To use numba, install it as:

pip install numba

Also, make sure that your numpy is compatible with Numba or not, although usually pip takes care of that. You can get the info here: https://pypi.org/project/numba/

Accelerating the above functions using Numba is quite simple. Just modify them in the following manner:

Sigmoid NUMBA implementation

from numba import njit 
@njit(cache=True,fastmath=True)
def Sigmoid(x):
    return 1/(1+np.exp(-x))

Sigmoid derivative NUMBA implementation

from numba import njit 
@njit(cache=True,fastmath=True)
def Sigmoid_grad(x):
    e_x = np.exp(-x)
    return e_x/(e_x+1)**2

While the implementations above seem simple and fast, they suffer from a big problem, i.e., they are susceptible to overflow or underflow.
To avoid under/overflow use the following alternative efinitions:

Sigmoid stable NumPy implementation 1

def Sigmoid(x): # Also known as logistic/soft step or even expit in scipy.special
# Alternative 1 (Doesn't work with Numba as boolean masking (fancy indexing) is not supported for 2D arrays -https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57915632/numba-nopython-mode-cannot-accept-2-d-boolean-indexing )
    # Hao Peng's answer from here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51976461/optimal-way-of-defining-a-numerically-stable-sigmoid-function-for-a-list-in-pyth
    pos_mask = (x >= 0)
    # Boolean array inversion is faster than another comparison
    neg_mask = ~pos_mask
    z = np.zeros_like(x)
    z[pos_mask] = np.exp(-x[pos_mask])
    z[neg_mask] = np.exp(x[neg_mask])
    top = np.ones_like(x)
    top[neg_mask] = z[neg_mask]
    return top / (1. + z)

Sigmoid stable NumPy implementation 2

def Sigmoid(x): # Also known as logistic/soft step or even expit in scipy.special
    # Alternative 2 (Quite slow on CPU but fast enough on GPU)
    # Neil G's answer from here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3985619/how-to-calculate-a-logistic-sigmoid-function-in-python
    return np.exp(-np.logaddexp(0., -x))

Sigmoid stable NUMBA implementation 3

@njit(cache=True,fastmath=True, parallel=True)
def Sigmoid(x): # Also known as logistic/soft step or even expit in scipy.special
    # Hao Peng's answer from here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51976461/optimal-way-of-defining-a-numerically-stable-sigmoid-function-for-a-list-in-pyth
    # Works only for 2D arrays
    output = np.zeros((x.shape[0],x.shape[1]),dtype=x.dtype)
    for i in prange(x.shape[0]):
        for j in range(x.shape[1]):
            x_val = x[i,j]
            if x_val>=0:
                output[i,j] = 1. / ( 1. + np.exp(-x_val) )
            else:
                e_x = np.exp(x_val)
                output[i,j] = e_x / ( 1. + e_x )
    return output

The last one based on Numba is quite fast and competitive with Tensorflow and PyTorch due to parallelization(https://github.com/manassharma07/crysx_nn/blob/main/benchmarks_tests/Performance_Activation_Functions_CPU.ipynb).

It is in fact also used in the CrysX-Neural Network library (crysx_nn)

Furthermore, the above implementations can be further accelerated using Cupy (CUDA), if using single precision (float32) is not a problem.

CuPy is an open-source array library for GPU-accelerated computing with Python. CuPy utilizes CUDA Toolkit libraries to make full use of the GPU architecture.

The Cupy implementations look as follows:

Sigmoid unstable Cupy implementation

import cupy as cp     
def Sigmoid_cupy(x):
    return 1/(1+cp.exp(-x))

Sigmoid stable Cupy implementation

def Sigmoid_cupy(x):
    return cp.exp(-cp.logaddexp(0., -x)) 

Sigmoid gradient Cupy implementation

[python]
def Sigmoid_grad_cupy(x):
    e_x = cp.exp(-x)
    return e_x/(e_x+1.)**2

The above code is also used in the crysx_nn library.
To see how the crysx_nn implementations of Sigmoid compare with TensorFlow and PyTorch, click here.

I hope you found this information useful.

If you did, then don’t forget to check out my other posts on Machine Learning and efficient implementations of activation/loss functions in Python.

References

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57915632/numba-nopython-mode-cannot-accept-2-d-boolean-indexing

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51976461/optimal-way-of-defining-a-numerically-stable-sigmoid-function-for-a-list-in-pyth

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3985619/how-to-calculate-a-logistic-sigmoid-function-in-python